Screenshots-Insane-BA-Flightplan

Originally uploaded by meriwilliams.

Back in December, I knew I was going to have a weekend where my choice was to either stay in Ohio on my own or go down and visit friends in Austin. Since I had some British Airways miles kicking around, I thought I should at least check whether they could get me to Austin on a reward ticket.

This was the flight plan they came up with for Houston (they wouldn’t even TALK to me about Austin!) — seems to get from Ohio to Texas, you have to stop in London on the way.

It made me laugh, anyway ;-)

I am such a fangirl. I just noticed that Mark Pilgrim has my delicious links on his blogroll and I totally squeaked. How sad is that? And I just used the word “totally” in a sentence, just like I was a character from Buffy or something. What is the world coming to?



Screenshots-Really-Scary-iTunes-Message

Originally uploaded by meriwilliams.

I love this error message — it tells you so much about the attitude to consumers ;-)

Elana has written a great post over on BlogHer about the shift in terminology from “workaholics” to “Extreme Jobs”.

What I find most interesting about this is the shift from personal responsibility (if you’re a workaholic, then you’ve chosen to be so) to situational/corporate responsibility (the job/company REQUIRES that you work crazy hours). On the one hand, it’s an unusual trend to see a move AWAY from personal responsibility. On the other, it’s a very dangerous slippery slope for the organisations creating the types of roles that require workers to routinely work 60-100 hours rather than the baseline 40.

The main reason I think this is dangerous is not because people won’t do the jobs (someone always will) or even because it will severely limit the diversity in those top roles (although it will). The real problem is that research has consistently shown that time worked and productivity are not directly proportional. Working more in short bursts (e.g. for an upcoming deadline) can be useful, but consistently working long hours leads to lower productivity.

Tom DeMarco in Slack: Getting Past Burn-out, Busywork, and the Myth of Total Efficiency discusses this in detail. He posits that when workers consistently work longer hours, any productivity gain is lost. Essentially, we are “re-baselined” — achieving the same amount of work in 10/12/14 hours as we would have done in 8.

Overwork can cause burn-out or even death. Selecting executives who have already lived through years or even decades of overwork, hoping to win the tournament are arguably the most at risk. So if your method for choosing your top executives is not who is most productive or effective, but really who can best withstand extremely long working hours, is that really smart?




Screenshots-I-Broke-Google-Browser-Sync

Originally uploaded by meriwilliams.

Seems that I might be over-abusing Firefox. I had over 250 tabs open today and when I tried to install Google Browser Sync, it completely bombed…

Today the conversation (let’s use that term loosely…) on Twitter briefly revisited what Rachel referred to as the “Where are the Women”-permathread. The main question, as always, was around why numbers of female speakers remains low at most web & tech conferences. Rather than get into this particular issue again, I’m going to go off on a slightly different angle and talk about affirmative action.

Affirmative action (aka positive discrimination) is often suggested as the solution to diversity/representation problems. No female speakers? Just pick some names out of a hat! Completely white audience? Let’s give tickets away to anyone we can find with a dark face!

Sometimes, AA is truly the best/only course of action. In extreme situations, I’ve even been known to support it myself (although the interesting thing in the South African context is that it is actually favourable to the previously-disenfranchised majority, rather than a minority). The real problem with it for me though, is that it perpetuates discrimination. If the only reason that you chose a speaker is because she is female (and this is pretty obvious to people) then they are going to discount that speaker — after all, how talented or interesting can she be, given that she’s only up there talking because she has breasts?

As Tom Coates remarked in a post last year:

“There’s something deeply entertaining to me about fighting for inclusivity by suggesting that some people only got to speak because they were in a minority group. Smart move! Inclusive!”

Personally, I agree with incentives to promote diversity. I think organisations should be rewarded for actively trying to be fair — to pick the person truly best for the job, to build a diverse workforce that uses differences to its advantage. I’m all in favour of levelling the playing field and helping people to understand when they are discriminating unconsciously. But when you lower your standards to meet an arbitrary target, you insult the very group you are trying to attract.

Part of the reason that I feel so strongly about this is that I tick just about every diversity box you can imagine. I’m a gay, disabled, African woman working in technology. But if one of those descriptors is the primary reason you want me to work for you… Well, let’s just say your chances of success approach zero rapidly!

Kathy Sierra has written an interesting response to the 5 things meme that has been floating around recently. Instead of answering the meme, she’s turned it ask her readership some questions. I’m going to answer them here because it gives me more space than in the comments ;-)

0) What’s your name and website URL? (optional, of course)
Meri Williamshttp://blog.meriwilliams.com

1) What’s the most fun work you’ve ever done, and why? (two sentences max)
Solving problems with a great team. I find that what I enjoy most is the “flow state”, bouncing ideas off smart people to solve difficult problems.

2) A. Name one thing you did in the past that you no longer do but wish you did? (one sentence max)
Ride my motorbike every day.

B. Name one thing you’ve always wanted to do but keep putting it off? (one sentence max)
Learn to snowboard.

3) A. What two things would you most like to learn or be better at, and why? (two sentences max)
I’d like to get better at coding again — I’m horribly out of practice and feel like I’m losing a valuable skill.
I’d also like to learn more about statistics, because it’s the one area of mathematics I’m really not great at.

B. If you could take a class/workshop/apprentice from anyone in the world living or dead, who would it be and what would you hope to learn? (two more sentences, max)
Nelson Mandela, to learn compassion. Anyone who can sit in prison for 26 years and come out the other end still loving and believing in humanity has a lot to teach.

4) A. What three words might your best friends or family use to describe you?
Confident, clever, pragmatic.

B. Now list two more words you wish described you…
Sociable, talented.

5) What are your top three passions? (can be current or past, work, hobbies, or causes– three sentences max)
Diversity — I passionately believe that you need a mix of different people, cultures and opinions to be successful.
Problem solving — I love fixing things/making them work better.
Guns — I love my guns.

6) (sue me) Write–and answer–one more question that YOU would ask someone (with answer in three sentences max)
Q: What is your favourite movie and why?
A: Addams Family Values, because it is camp, hilarious and a great lesson in how even families that seem really strange from the outside can still be loving.

I rather like the 5 things meme that is going around at the moment, so I’m going to take Eric Meyer’s open tag as an excuse to participate ;-)

Admittedly, I found this quite hard to do — different groups of friends know very different things about me. There are various things that would be a real surprise to work friends that are identifying characteristics to my web friends and vice versa. So I’m just going to do my best here!

Five things you might not know about me:

  1. When I was at school, I helped build part of South Africa’s first satellite. I also helped to develop the method by which we tracked and evaluated the results.
  2. I am a crack shot, best with handguns and assault rifles, although I do like to play with the occasional sniper rifle too. My parents are opposed to firearms and would never have one in the house, so I learnt to shoot when I join the target shooting team in highschool.
  3. My first big career direction decision had me choosing between going to study Computer Science (my eventual choice), Classics (Latin & Ancient Greek) or attending Film School.
  4. For a few years I was half of a soft rock duo. My primary contribution was song-writing and backing guitar.
  5. Growing up, I was extremely short-sighted, to the extent that I would walk into walls if I tried to go anywhere without my glasses on. After many years wearing contact lenses, they damaged my eyes, so I had to stop playing waterpolo. To remedy this, I had laser eye surgery, which gave me 20/20 vision for the first time in my life.

I’m going to tag Elly, Rachel, Simon, Guy and Nat. Oh and Mili too.