<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone&#8217;s Talking About&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/</link>
	<description>Making things useful, getting stuff done</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:47:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Dunck</title>
		<link>http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Dunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meriwilliams.com/?p=210#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>I started using a computer (Apple ][e) when I was about 10.

I did not become a touch typist until I was about 16, when I discovered MUDs, and had incentive to both read and write at the same time, and enjoyed the experience while I was at it.

I hover around 60 wpm now; not screamingly fast, but definitely faster than most of my peers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using a computer (Apple ][e) when I was about 10.</p>
<p>I did not become a touch typist until I was about 16, when I discovered MUDs, and had incentive to both read and write at the same time, and enjoyed the experience while I was at it.</p>
<p>I hover around 60 wpm now; not screamingly fast, but definitely faster than most of my peers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meri</title>
		<link>http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>Meri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meriwilliams.com/?p=210#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>The key thing I meant is that people shouldn&#039;t be held up by the medium they are using to express their thoughts. In a corporate setting the &quot;henpecker&quot; typist (slowly seeking and then hitting with just one finger) is still a worryingly frequent sight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key thing I meant is that people shouldn&#8217;t be held up by the medium they are using to express their thoughts. In a corporate setting the &#8220;henpecker&#8221; typist (slowly seeking and then hitting with just one finger) is still a worryingly frequent sight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meriwilliams.com/?p=210#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that even though I&#039;m a slow reader and typist I can still read and type much faster than I can think. Certainly, when writing code or prose I do a lot more thinking than typing, and much of the time I find the same is true of reading.(Maybe I&#039;m an even slower thinker...) Perhaps the subjective impression of the relative speed of one&#039;s thinking, reading and writing is really a measure of how worthwhile a challenge is being posed by whatever is being read or written.

I could sometimes do with being able to type more slowly, especially when directly modifying live mission-critical databases using SQL (yes, I know I shouldn&#039;t be doing this) - it&#039;s very easy to fall into the trap of thinking that because one has finished typing one has also finished thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that even though I&#8217;m a slow reader and typist I can still read and type much faster than I can think. Certainly, when writing code or prose I do a lot more thinking than typing, and much of the time I find the same is true of reading.(Maybe I&#8217;m an even slower thinker&#8230;) Perhaps the subjective impression of the relative speed of one&#8217;s thinking, reading and writing is really a measure of how worthwhile a challenge is being posed by whatever is being read or written.</p>
<p>I could sometimes do with being able to type more slowly, especially when directly modifying live mission-critical databases using SQL (yes, I know I shouldn&#8217;t be doing this) &#8211; it&#8217;s very easy to fall into the trap of thinking that because one has finished typing one has also finished thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meri</title>
		<link>http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Meri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meriwilliams.com/?p=210#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Personally, I was lucky enough to be taught speedreading at an early age (i.e. in high school). We had a computer program (dos-based -- ran off floppies, but I can&#039;t remember the name of it!) that helped you read faster, but tested your comprehension each time and wouldn&#039;t let you progress to a faster speed until you had reached 80% comprehension. The fastest I ever achieved with 100% comprehension was 1500 wpm, but 7 years later my reading speed when I&#039;m not trying is around 800 wpm and I can skim with high comprehension if I need to.

In terms of what speed-reading course I&#039;d recommend now, I&#039;m honestly just not familiar with any commercial ones. Wikipedia&#039;s article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_reading&quot;&gt;speed-reading&lt;/a&gt; seems to be along the right tracks though. The key thing is to choose a course that focuses on retaining comprehension as well as increasing speed (i.e. not just a skimming course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I was lucky enough to be taught speedreading at an early age (i.e. in high school). We had a computer program (dos-based &#8212; ran off floppies, but I can&#8217;t remember the name of it!) that helped you read faster, but tested your comprehension each time and wouldn&#8217;t let you progress to a faster speed until you had reached 80% comprehension. The fastest I ever achieved with 100% comprehension was 1500 wpm, but 7 years later my reading speed when I&#8217;m not trying is around 800 wpm and I can skim with high comprehension if I need to.</p>
<p>In terms of what speed-reading course I&#8217;d recommend now, I&#8217;m honestly just not familiar with any commercial ones. Wikipedia&#8217;s article on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_reading">speed-reading</a> seems to be along the right tracks though. The key thing is to choose a course that focuses on retaining comprehension as well as increasing speed (i.e. not just a skimming course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Dunck</title>
		<link>http://blog.meriwilliams.com/2005/02/08/everyones-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Dunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meriwilliams.com/?p=210#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>Meri, can you recommend a particular speed reading course?

I&#039;m very much interested in improving my reading speed; comprehension and retention is still very important to me, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meri, can you recommend a particular speed reading course?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very much interested in improving my reading speed; comprehension and retention is still very important to me, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

